1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

1..

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, except in the following cases, and thus, it is accepted in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420

【The part of the judgment of the court of first instance,” which was a part of the judgment of the court of first instance, shall be subject to the entire development of the Defendant’s Nurur Industry.

Of the facts based on paragraph (1), the parts concerning Codefendant B, C, D, E, F, and Geum River System Chang-gu Codefendants in the first instance trial and paragraph (2) shall be deleted, and the names of Codefendants in the first instance trial among paragraph (3) shall be entirely removed from “Defendant” to “Codefendants in the first instance trial.”

7 The following shall be added to the last part of 3 parallels from the inside below:

Although the Defendant, as of July 16, 2004, the rate of construction as of 45.86%, was 45.86%, and thereafter, the Malim General Construction and Mala General Construction failed to carry out the construction work properly, even if the progress rate of the Mala General Construction and Mala General Construction had reached 90% around 2008, it is argued that the Mala General Construction had reached KRW 1.3 billion due to the resumption of construction at around 2010 after around 2010. However, it is insufficient to recognize that the Mala General Construction’s claim for construction cost reaches KRW 1.3 billion solely on the grounds stated in the evidence Nos. 11, 12, and 13 and the above stated facts alleged by the Defendant.

It is difficult to recognize that the construction of a large-wheeled comprehensive with no. 13 consented to the succession of the first claim between the defendant and the mining comprehensive construction."

2. Conclusion, the part against the defendant in the judgment of the first instance is justifiable.

The defendant's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.