1. The plaintiff's appeal and the claim extended by this court and the defendant's appeal are all dismissed.

2. Filing an appeal;

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance, such as accepting the judgment of the court of first instance, is as follows 2. The relevant part of the judgment of the court of first instance is modified as stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance (excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, excluding the part of the judgment of the court of first instance, as stated in the following (3).

2. On the 3rd 12th 12th 12th 3th 12th 12th 1th 3th 3th 4th 4th 4th "the remainder except the No. 5, 7th 5, and 5th 7th 7th 1," "the 1,2,6,8,9,9, and 10th 4th 4th 4th amendment "the 9th 4th th th th th th th "the th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th "the th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th th" amendment " the 14th th th th th th th th th th 60.".".

3. Supplement and addition of judgments;

A. The Plaintiff asserts that long-term care benefits expenses could have been borne since the director actually provided visiting benefits. Therefore, even if the Plaintiff claimed expenses for long-term care benefits in the name of another caregiver, it is not subject to the “collection of unjust enrichment” under Article 43 of the Act, which prohibits possession of benefits without legal cause related to the expenses for long-term care benefits.

Article 43(1) of the Act as seen in the first instance judgment cited by this Court.