logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원천안지원 2019.08.21 2017가단107717
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 14,918,440 to Plaintiff A; and (b) KRW 300,000 to Plaintiff B; and (c) KRW 100,000 to Plaintiff C and D respectively.

Reasons

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. 1) The Defendant is the F Corporation (hereinafter “instant construction”).

Plaintiff A is the contractor in charge of the construction. Plaintiff A is G concrete mixtures truck (standard 6 cubic metres; hereinafter “instant vehicle”).

H Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Nonindicted Co., Ltd.”) which entered into a ready-mixed supply contract with the Defendant as the owner.

(2) Around 07:40 on June 28, 2017, the Plaintiff, while entering the construction site of the instant case, was driving the instant vehicle and driving the instant vehicle to transport ready-mixeds at the construction site from March 2017. (2) On June 28, 2017, the Plaintiff, while driving the instant vehicle and entering the construction site of the instant case, was driving the instant vehicle on the right side while passing through the access road on the front direction of the instant construction site, and the Plaintiff, while passing through the right side of the instant construction site, caused an accident (hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”).

Due to the accident of this case, the plaintiff A sustained an injury, such as a cerebral le, the left-hand side and a scarke wall, and the vehicle of this case was destroyed.

3) The above access road is a temporary site for construction works not packed, and the lower surface of the instant road was cut off, and there was a slope of about 30 degrees toward the edge of the road, where there was a ditch between the road and the road. The maximum width was 3.2 meters to the edge of the road. While the access road was on the site of the instant accident, there was a signal number at the site of the instant accident, but there was no facility or safety signs to prevent the instant vehicle from safely passing through the road, by witnessing the entry of the instant vehicle in the vicinity of the other workshop immediately after driving the contact.

5) After the occurrence of the instant accident, the Defendant took measures to allow the instant construction vehicle to pass by using the bypass road. 6) Plaintiff B is the wife of Plaintiff A, and Plaintiff C and D are the children of Plaintiff C and D.

[Reasons for Recognition] There is no dispute, Gap 1-5, 11-15, .

arrow