logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2019.11.21 2019가단5059277
대여금
Text

1. The Defendant’s KRW 55,524,769 and the said money to the Plaintiff:

A. From January 24, 2019 to February 7, 2019, for KRW 34,536,898

Reasons

1. The reasons for the indication of the claim are as shown in the Appendix of Claim.

(However, “creditor” is “Plaintiff,” and “debtor” refers to “Defendant,” respectively. 2. A confession judgment (Article 208(3)2 of the Civil Procedure Act) (Article 208(3)) only submitted a written objection to the payment order without stating any substantial grounds for disputing the Plaintiff’s claim, and did not appear on the date of pleading after the submission of a written response. Thus, it is deemed that the Defendant led to the confession of all the Plaintiff’s assertion under Article 150 of the Civil Procedure Act.

arrow