logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주지방법원 2016.07.13 2016고단682
사기
Text

1. Defendant A’s above Defendant 1 is from 1 to 1’s list of crimes in the annexed Form No. 1 of the crime No. 2016 higher group 682, as indicated in the judgment.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The common crime of "2016 Highest 682", "2016 Highest 699, the 2016 Highest 99, the 1259 Highest 2016 Highest 2016 Highest 2016 Highest 1259, the Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport for the crime of fraud of lending employee's entire house rental loan - The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport for the purpose of stabilizing the residence of homeless employees, using the National Housing Fund as a source of funds for the National Housing Fund to lend employee's entire house rental loan at a rate lower

The crime of fraud of lending money to false workers is the structure of taking account of the fact that the financial institution entrusted with the business related to lending money to workers on a deposit basis with the employment of the lessee and the submission only of the documents related to the lending money on a deposit basis may easily obtain the loan through a formal examination if only the submission of the lending contract is made. The lending bropiers solicits the house owner who will act as the lessor by fraudulent means, and falsely recruited the lending owner who will apply for the lending money to workers on a deposit basis. As such, as if the lending owner actually works for the actual workers, the lending owner prepares false employment-related documents such as a certificate of employment under the name of the disguised company, a detailed statement of payment, and a certificate of collection of income tax as if the lending owner actually enters into a housing lease contract, and then prepares a false employment-related documents and a written contract for lease on a deposit basis as if the false lessee and the lessor actually enter into a housing lease contract.

Defendant A was sentenced to a suspended sentence of six months for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act at the Gwangju District Court on November 17, 2015, and was sentenced to a suspended sentence of two years for a violation of the Electronic Financial Transactions Act. On November 25, 2015, the said judgment became final and conclusive on November 25, 2015.

【Criminal Facts】

1. Defendants A and C’s frauds Defendant A and C are loan brobeers, O (the indictment of detention by Suwon Flag, Jan. 26, 2016), P (Suspension of Prosecution on January 26, 2016), Q (the suspension of prosecution on January 26, 2016).

arrow