The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.

1. According to the evidence submitted by the Prosecutor’s summary of the grounds for appeal, the judgment of the court below which acquitted the Defendant of the facts charged, is erroneous in the misapprehension of legal principles or by misapprehending legal principles, even though the victim was widely known and at least the victim was likely to spread to many and unspecified persons, and the performance of 10 carpets, such as J, etc. where the Defendant well-known that “G” and “G” referred to by the Defendant refer to the victim E.

2. Determination

가. 공소사실의 요지 피고인은 2014. 1. 13. 03:01경 불상의 장소에서 ‘C’ 라는 닉네임으로 인터넷 네이버 카페 'D 게시판에 접속하여 피해자 E를 가리켜 “F님 또 괴롭히면 너 명예훼손 띠리한다~!!! 작업 좀 작작하고 ^.~ 두 살림 하는거 온 카페가 다 알던데 제발 들키지 말고 ”라는 내용의 글을 게시하였다.

However, there was no fact that the victim did not live two.

Accordingly, the defendant has damaged the reputation of the victim by divulging false facts openly through the information and communication network for the purpose of slandering the victim.

B. First of all, the judgment of the court below and the decision of the political party 1, the following facts and circumstances, namely, the defendant written comments on the NAC bulletin board "D", and the victim E posted comments that criticize the defendant's comments on the NAC, the victim E posted comments on the part of "G", and the plaintiff defendant and the person with the ID "F" expressed comments to criticize or criticize the comments on the comments of "G", and the facts in the facts charged are one of such comments, and the defendant argued that the contents of "H" such comments are referred to as "G," not "H," but "H," but the whole contents of the above comments are different, and the problem is that the member who was demoted and demoted.

more than n.e.