1. On the basis of the executory exemplification of the judgment of Daejeon District Court 2014 Ghana5202, the Defendant rendered an executory exemplification of the judgment of Daejeon District Court on August 11, 2014.

1. In full view of the purport of the entire pleadings as to the statement in Gap evidence No. 2, the defendant, based on the Daejeon District Court Decision 2014Gaso5202 decided on August 11, 2014, based on the judgment of Daejeon District Court 2014Daso5202 decided on August 11, 2014, the fact that the defendant conducted attachment enforcement (hereinafter “instant compulsory execution”) with respect to movables and Nowon-gu in the attached list attached No. 103 Dong101 (E apartment).

2. The parties' assertion and judgment

A. Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments as to movables indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through 4, 6, and 9, the purport of the argument as to movables indicated in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 3 is as follows: F purchased movables listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 owned by Daejeon District Court No. 2010 and 2, 6, 7, and 8; and G purchased movables listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 7, and 8 at the auction procedure on December 1, 2010; the Plaintiff purchased movables listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1, 2, 3, 4, 7, and 8 from G to 30 December 30, 2010, the Plaintiff purchased movables, etc. from 9 to 4, i.e.,, the Plaintiff’s title of the aforementioned movable property in the separate list No. 9.

Therefore, the plaintiff's above assertion is justified.

B. The Plaintiff asserts that since the movables listed in No. 5 of the Attached List No. 5 are owned by the Plaintiff, the enforcement of the instant case against the said movables should be denied. Accordingly, the Defendant’s movables listed in the Attached List No. 5 are in accordance with C.