logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2021.01.19 2020가단115119
관리비
Text

The Defendant, as the Plaintiff

(a) 3,818,870 Won and its related 5% per annum from November 3, 2020 to January 19, 2021;

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The E market is a primary complex building with the 1st underground and the 6th underground floor located in Gangdong-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government F (hereinafter “instant building”), which is currently being used as a commercial building from the 1st underground to the 4th underground floor, and the 5th ground and 6th underground as an apartment building.

B. G Co., Ltd. succeeded to the market founder status under the Wholesale and Retail Trade Promotion Act for E market from H Co., Ltd. on October 7, 1994; however, G Co., Ltd. was revoked from the head of Gangdong-gu on the ground that “it is prohibited from operating a normal market.” On April 25, 2007, G Co., Ltd. transferred the right to manage the instant building to I.

(c)

E The E market was originally constructed as a commercial building of the 1st underground and the 3th above ground, and G corporation implemented a construction project on 1990 and increased the scale on March 191, 191, and even after completion of sale in the case of the 4, 5, and 6th above the extended area, it is still still in the state of registration until now.

(d)

G Co., Ltd. entered into a building management entrustment contract with the Plaintiff on March 31, 2011 with the content that it entrusts the lease and management of the building of this case.

E. On the other hand, on September 21, 2009, the Plaintiff entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the lease of KRW 10,000,00, monthly rent of KRW 300,00, and the period from September 25, 2009 to September 25, 2010 (hereinafter “instant lease agreement”) with regard to the lease of KRW 72.72 square meters in the instant building, which is linked in sequence to each point of the attached drawings, among the instant building.

The Defendant did not pay monthly rent from February 2018, when the instant lease contract was implicitly renewed.

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence Nos. 1, 2, 5 through 7, 16, Eul evidence No. 6 (including branch numbers), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The assertion and judgment

A. The plaintiff's summary of the plaintiff's assertion is 3, 4, 5, and 5 among the buildings of this case.

arrow