beta
Text
1. The Defendant’s KRW 98,080,80 for the Plaintiff and its related KRW 5% per annum from September 11, 2015 to June 13, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. On April 17, 2012, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for reinforced concrete construction works among the above construction works, which was supplied with construction works of new houses at the headquarters of the company above C in Naju-si from B Co., Ltd., and re-subcontracted the said construction works to the Plaintiff around that time.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff completed the said construction work (hereinafter “instant B construction”) by requiring the 37,771 cubic meters of concrete snow volume.
B. Around 2013, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for reinforced concrete construction works between Tae Young Construction Co., Ltd., Tae Young-gu, Bred General Construction Co., Ltd and D Co., Ltd. (E) and a graduate school dormitory construction works, and re-subcontracted the said construction works to the Plaintiff on May 2013.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff completed the aforesaid construction works (hereinafter “instant F concrete construction works”) by requiring the 29,029 cubic meters of concrete snow volume, as well as completing the said construction works. From April 18, 2013 to January 9, 2015, the Plaintiff entrusted the instant construction works to the said construction site.
(hereinafter referred to as the “FF Corporation”). C.
Around December 5, 2013, the Defendant entered into a subcontract for reinforced concrete construction works among the above construction works, and re-subcontracted the said construction works to the Plaintiff on December 5, 2013.
Accordingly, the Plaintiff completed the said construction work (hereinafter “the instant tennis construction”) with the requirement of 29,072 cubic metres from the 29,072 cubic metres.
[Ground of recognition] Evidence No. 1, Evidence No. 3-1 to 3, Evidence No. 2-1 to 3, respectively, and the fact-finding results and the purport of the whole pleadings of this court against Eul corporation
2. The assertion and judgment
A. As to the unit price per cubic meter with respect to the instant construction project, the Plaintiff asserts that the Plaintiff agreed to KRW 7,500, and the Defendant agreed to KRW 7,000, respectively.