1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

Purport of claim and appeal

The first instance court.

1. The plaintiff's assertion that the plaintiff lent KRW 50 million to C, who is his/her father and wife, and as such, C borrowed money from the plaintiff for daily living. Since the defendant is the spouse of C, the defendant is also liable to pay the above money.

2. According to the overall purport of each statement and pleading by the judgment of the court below, Gap evidence No. 4 (including the branch number), the plaintiff transferred each of the following amounts to the account of his/her father, his/her father, to his/her husband and wife, with the amount of KRW 25 million on September 25, 2012, KRW 3 million on November 21, 2012, KRW 7 million on November 29, 2012, KRW 5 million on December 3, 2012, KRW 500,000 on December 3, 2012, KRW 16,000 on January 16, 2014, and KRW 750,000 on October 19, 2015, and the facts that the plaintiff and the defendant are married may be recognized.

However, the above facts and the evidence submitted by the plaintiff alone are insufficient to recognize that the plaintiff used the money remitted to C for daily home life.

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the plaintiff's claim of this case is dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance is just, and the plaintiff's appeal is dismissed as it is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.