A defendant shall be punished by a fine of 500,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a person who serves as the head of the C's business entity, a cleaning service company.

C Co., Ltd. provided approximately KRW 130 million cleaning services from the “F” community building owned by E Co., Ltd. in Seongbuk-gu, Sungnam-si. However, it did not receive the payment from E.

Since then, on August 4, 2016, G Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “F”) had been awarded a successful bid on the said building by selling the said building in accordance with the public sale procedure, the Defendant had been involved in the said building to exercise the right of retention on the service payment.

On September 26, 2016, the Defendant: (a) around 14:00, at around 14:00, carried out a substitute bulletin stating that, under the pretext of exercising the right of retention on the service-price claim that was not paid by E, the former owner of the said building, the Defendant would not have access to the headquarters and film house of the said building with locks; (b) the employees of the victim company would not have access to the facilities of the victim company; and (c) attached on each door the door “in the course of exercising the right of retention.”

Accordingly, the defendant interfered with the safety inspection of the victim company's building and repair of defects one hour through force.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement made by the police with H;

1. A certified copy of real estate registry;

1. Application of each statute on photographs;

1. Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act applicable to the relevant criminal facts and Article 314 (Selection of Penalty) of the Criminal Act;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;