logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 의정부지방법원 2013.07.19 2013고단1354
특정범죄가중처벌등에관한법률위반(도주차량)등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

1. Violation of the Act on the Aggravated Punishment, etc. of Specific Crimes and the Road Traffic Act (non-accidentd measures) are those who are engaged in driving of Branchising automobiles;

On April 14, 2013, at around 12:10, the Defendant, while under the influence of alcohol with a blood alcohol concentration of 0.098%, driven a low-scale car, and led the Defendant to drive a three-lane road in front of the bus stops located near the private labor in the Guri-si in the Guri-si Labor, along with two-lanes from the point of view of the decline in the Namyang-si, Namyang-si.

There are crosswalks where signal lights are installed in the front, and there are vehicles driving ahead, so the defendant engaged in driving service has a duty of care to safely drive by taking into account the speed reduction and the right and the right and the right and the right of the driver.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and got off the scene by driving the said franchise without taking such measures as identifying the degree of injury of the victim, or informing him of his personal information, while receiving the part of the victim C (the 21-year-old driver), which was in the air traffic signal at the front of the road, as well as the part of the franchis-p vehicle (the 21-year-old driver) driving, which was in front of the franchis-free vehicle, for about two weeks.

At around 12:15 on the same day, the Defendant continued to drive the franchising car, and continued to drive the franchising car in order to keep three lanes in front of the franchising building in front of the franchising 298, which is located in the 298 principle of the compost from the franchising distance to the bank.

At the same time, there is a central line, and as a defendant engaged in driving service, there was a duty of care to thoroughly operate the front line and safely to protect the tea.

Nevertheless, the defendant neglected this and neglected to turn to the left at the front of the defendant's negligence of overtaking the center line, and thereby driving the victim E(the age of 48).

arrow