logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 인천지방법원 2015.08.26 2014가단254851
건물등철거
Text

1. The defendant is against the plaintiff, and Ga.

Attached Form

Removal of buildings indicated in the list;

(b) deliver the land recorded in the annexed list;

Reasons

1. The Plaintiff, on November 6, 2014, was awarded a bid for 24/26 shares of the land No. 1 and the second land among the lands listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “instant land”) and completed the registration of ownership transfer on November 13, 2014. On September 13, 2002, the Defendant constructed a new building listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “the instant building”) in order to connect each point of the attached sheet No. 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, and 1 among the instant land on September 13, 2002, and completed the registration of ownership preservation of the instant land, and owned and used the instant land as the site of the instant building. Since rent No. 500,000 for the portion of the instant building is no dispute between the parties to the instant land, or the Defendant did not have a duty to remove the pertinent land’s profits from the entire land No. 1, 200, which is the owner of the instant land.

2. The defendant's assertion and judgment

A. As to the claim on land lease, the defendant's husband, completed the registration of ownership transfer concerning shares 24/26 and 2 of the land No. 1, and the defendant newly constructed the building of this case with the consent of C, and the defendant entered into an implied lease contract with C, and the rent was paid by allowing the use of the building of this case as household expenses. Thus, the defendant is a provision of Article 622(1) of the Civil Act.

arrow