Text
1. The Defendants are jointly and severally liable to the Plaintiff for 7,89,545 won and the period from May 4, 2016 to November 29, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The Plaintiff is a public corporation established under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act (hereinafter “Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act”) that carries out the industrial accident compensation insurance business after being entrusted by the Minister of Labor.
B. (1) The Green Energy Development Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “ScarB”) concluded a service agreement with Defendant ScarB, Inc. (hereinafter “Defendant ScarB”) on the transportation of scarB in Seo-dong, Seo-gu, Incheon.
(Contract Period between January 1, 2012 and August 31, 2013) (2) B is an employee of the non-party company, who is a place of business subject to industrial accident compensation insurance under the Industrial Accident Compensation Insurance Act, and the defendant A is an employee of the defendant ScarB, who is in charge of the operation of the scarb at the above site.
C. Around 18:00 on May 31, 2013, around 18:50, Defendant A requested auxiliary work for the repair of the open entrance, and around 18:55, Defendant A scarb, who was driven by Defendant A (C; hereinafter “C”) in order to connect the entrance door to the upper part of the entrance, and the scarb was on the scarb and macker owned by Defendant A, and there was an accident that caused the injury, such as the scarbing of the scarb owned by Defendant A (hereinafter “the scarber”). At the time, there was no safe flab that connects the boomer with the boomer and the boomer and the safety booming of the safety boom, which was not installed, so the flaber’s boom was separated from B’s boom, and the accident was caused.
(hereinafter “instant accident”). D.
By May 3, 2016, the Plaintiff paid 25,263,770 won as temporary layoff benefits, 55,689,060 won as medical care benefits, and 42,458,770 won as disability benefits, respectively.
[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, Gap evidence 1 to 7, Eul evidence 1 to 5, the purport of the whole pleadings
2. According to the above recognition of the occurrence of the liability for damages, Defendant A was installed a safety net that connects the boom boomer with the boomer prior to the operation of the boomer in this case, and a safety net that prevents the swimming of the safety boom and the safety boom.