1. All of the plaintiffs' claims are dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit are assessed against the plaintiffs.

1. Basic facts

A. On May 2007, the Defendant awarded a contract for the portion of cable railways and electrical construction works among the development projects and the installation works of lifts located in Taecheon-si in Gangwon-do. On May 27, 2008, the Defendant awarded a subcontract for the said construction works in the name of D with the trade name of D around May 27, 2008 for the said construction works (hereinafter “instant construction works”) in the cost of construction KRW 120,000 (value-added tax separately).

(hereinafter “instant subcontract”). (b)

Plaintiff

On December 28, 2008, A worked as a worker for day duty at the construction site of the instant construction project, and was engaged in the installation of a light cable from the lower part of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part, to the upper part of the top part. However, while the top part of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part, the nd part of the nd part of the nd part, which was in the lower part of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part, with the power of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part, was towed to the upper part of the nd part of the nd part of the nd part. In the process, the plaintiff A suffered from the injury, such as the left part of the nd part of the nd part, the left part of the nd part of the nd part of

(hereinafter referred to as “instant accident”). C.

Plaintiff

A filed an application for medical care benefits with the Korea Workers' Compensation and Welfare Service through the industrial accident compensation insurance that the Defendant joined, and received 108,229,980 won as temporary disability compensation benefits, 30,120,610 won as medical care benefits, and 61,361,080 won as disability benefits.

Plaintiff

B is the spouse of the plaintiff A.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence 1 through 3, 6, 7, Eul evidence 1, 4, 5, 7, 9, and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. The parties' assertion

A. The plaintiffs asserted that ① the defendant, as the employer who employs the plaintiff A, should perform his duty of safety consideration by taking safety measures when the defendant engages in dangerous work, but the accident of this case is negligent in neglecting this duty.