logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.10.11 2016가단8715
구상금
Text

1.To the extent of the property inherited from the deceased B, the Selection C shall not exceed 37,060,995 won and 13,450 out of them.

Reasons

From July 31, 2001 to August 30, 201, the Plaintiff issued four credit guarantee certificates to high agricultural cooperatives according to the credit guarantee agreement with the deceased (hereinafter “the deceased”). Under each credit guarantee agreement, the Deceased agreed to pay to the Plaintiff damages for delay, guarantee fees, fines for negligence, and legal procedural expenses incurred by the Plaintiff for the performance of the guaranteed obligation and for the preservation of the relevant claim, until the date of full payment, the Plaintiff’s credit guarantee accident occurred after receiving a loan from the above association as collateral, and the Plaintiff applied for the above credit guarantee number of KRW 40,352,78 to the above association until January 28, 2001 (the above association’s 40,352,783). As of March 15, 2015, the deceased’s reimbursement and substitute payment amount of KRW 86,570,184,186,3816,3816,365, etc. of the deceased’s compensation fees and damages for delay between the deceased and the deceased’s 201.

According to the above facts of recognition, the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties are obligated to pay each principal and damages for delay on the text of the judgment within the scope of the property inherited by the deceased as the heir of the deceased’s property, which corresponds to each inherited share among the indemnity obligations owed by the deceased against the Plaintiff. Thus, the Plaintiff’s claim against the Defendant (Appointed Party) and the appointed parties in this case are with merit.

arrow