1. 1,019,465,651 of the Plaintiff’s conjunctive claim against Defendant Samho Co., Ltd. and damages for delay.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. 1) The Plaintiff is a party to the instant apartment, comprised of five households located in Daegu-gun, 5 Dong-dong 698 (hereinafter “instant apartment”).

(2) In order to manage the apartment complex, the apartment complex construction (hereinafter collectively referred to as the “Defendant Western Construction”) is the executor of the apartment complex of this case, and the Defendant Samho Construction Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendant Samho”) is a contractor of the instant apartment complex, and the new apartment building construction is contracted by the Defendant Western Construction.

3) The Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association guaranteed the obligation to repair the defects of the apartment of this case by Defendant 3. B. On January 31, 2005, the Defendant Construction Mutual Aid Association concluded each contract for the construction of the new apartment of this case (hereinafter “the instant contract for the guarantee of defects”) between Defendant 3 and Defendant 3 with the guarantee creditor as the head of Daegu Gun to achieve the guarantee creditor, and issued each contract for the construction of the instant apartment of this case as shown in the following table. After which the Plaintiff, an autonomous management organization of the instant apartment of this case, constituted the Plaintiff, the guarantee creditor was changed to the Plaintiff.

The warranty number No. 16760 from March 24, 2008 to March 23, 2018; the bearing wall No. 542,463,254 21671 to March 23, 2013; the floor, roof, 542,463, 254 31672, 254 31672, 208 to March 24, 2011 1,08,084,084, 1,084, 926, 5074, 1676, 5074, 16736, 16736, 167363, 208; and 3638,437,537,284,206, etc.

C. On March 24, 2008, the inspection of the use of the apartment of this case and the construction of the defendant Seodae-dae was approved by the competent authority for the inspection of the use of the apartment of this case. The defendant Sam-dae did not construct the part to be constructed in accordance with the design drawing with respect to the apartment of this case, or did not construct the defective construction or design drawing.