logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2017.09.21 2017노644
자동차관리법위반
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the lower court’s punishment (five million won penalty) is too unreasonable.

2. The judgment of the court below was conducted by the defendant when committing a crime, and it was divided, and the repair cost was not received from the customer who requested the repair of a motor vehicle, but the defendant's arbitrary operation of the motor vehicle as a motor vehicle maintenance business operator is not less than the nature of the crime of this case, and the period of the defendant's operation of the motor vehicle is long and the number of times is long, and the damage to the customer is not recovered, and all of the sentencing conditions in the arguments of this case, including the defendant's age, sex, environment, etc., are considered to be too unreasonable.

3. According to the conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow