logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대구지방법원 2016.11.25 2015가합3116
손해배상(기)
Text

1. The Plaintiff:

A. The Defendants jointly share KRW 151,238,00 and as to this, from March 26, 2015 to September 30, 2016.

Reasons

1. Facts of recognition;

A. In the Plaintiff Company, Defendant B served as the managing director, and Defendant C as the managing director, respectively.

The Defendant, from around February 2008 to February 2015, has been engaged in the sale and collection of street lamps of the said company at A, a victim in Daegu Dong-gu, Daegu-gu, and its operating director.

1. Around March 7, 2012, the Defendant: (a) supplied a copy of the title “F” in Seo-gu, Daegu; and (b) collected KRW 880,000 from the value of the title “T” and kept in custody for the victim; (c) around that time, the Defendant consumed for personal purposes, such as gambling funds, from the KRW 880,000 in the value of the title “F.”

From around that time to December 24, 2014, the Defendant consumed a total of KRW 151,238,000 in the same way from the Daegu Roster to 39 times, such as the list of crimes (1) as shown in the attached Table of Crimes (1).

Accordingly, the defendant embezzled the victim's property.

2. The defendant in breach of occupational duty is a business director of the above victim, who is engaged in business affairs, such as contact with a trader's employee, settlement of the price with a corporate card.

When an employee belonging to the company uses a corporate card, he/she shall use it only for the purpose related to the business of the company, and shall use it for the purpose irrelevant to the business affairs so that the company does not cause any damage.

Nevertheless, around July 8, 2013, the Defendant purchased gift certificates of an amount equivalent to KRW 4,00,000 at the market price from the Daegu Northern-dong 2 to 378-23 using the corporate card owned by the victim and incurred damages equivalent to the same amount to the victim, as indicated in the separate crime list (2) between around that time to January 17, 2015, from the Daegu-dong 22,50,000 to nine times in total, as indicated in the separate crime list (2).

B. Defendant B was the Daegu District Court Decision 2015Kadan5919 on July 14, 2016.

arrow