All of the prosecutions of this case are dismissed.

1. The summary of the facts charged is a cargo driver who delivers goods produced in Heung-gu, Young-gu, Cheongju-si, C, and the victim D (the 49 years old) is a person who works as a member in charge of guidance at the above C Security Office.

Since January 2019, the Defendant left in the family relation with the victim, the victim was born to the victim who was not the victim. A.

(1) On February 4, 2019, the Defendant, at around 20:00, damaged the reputation of the victim by openly pointing out a fact to the victim E, who is the workplace partner of the victim working in the above C, by posting a phone to the victim E, who is a “D or imperied person.”

(2) At around 12:30 on February 5, 2019, the Defendant paid money to “D” to “F of the Security Room: (a) 50 weeks; and (b) 70 weeks. The same was the same; (c) embling another person; (d) embling that person; and (e) embling that person; and (e) harming the victim’s reputation by openly pointing out facts.

(3) On February 7, 2019, the Defendant posted a phone call to the F, thereby impairing the honor of the victim by publicly pointing out the fact that “in the Republic of Korea, as it has been in a bad relationship with D, leaving the company,” and “.”

B. On February 4, 2019, the Defendant violated the Act on Promotion, etc. of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, etc.: (a) sent the victim text messages using a mobile phone to “fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-fast-f

Accordingly, the Defendant repeatedly reached the victim with the language that arouses fear or apprehension through the information and communications network.

2. Of the facts charged in the instant case, each of the above facts charged constituted defamation under Article 307(1) and (2) of the Criminal Act.