1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.

2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.

1. Details of the disposition;

A. On May 28, 1981, the Plaintiff was appointed as a local public official in the Si of Pakistan, and has been in charge of the operation and management of the North Korean Tourist Site in the Si of Pakistan, including movable property in postal administration, third ground excavation, and Dora-to-Do Do Do Ra-to-Do Do Do Do Do Do Do.

B. On May 12, 2013, the Plaintiff anticipated that DMF tourists would be protruding 5 millions around June 12, 2013, and planned to teach the “DMF Security Tourist events” (hereinafter “instant commemorative events”).

C. The Plaintiff: (a) requested “C” located in Pakistan-si, for the production of a logtotop, a bus board banner, and a banner for publicity; and (b) ordered the construction business for the maintenance of movable property and ecological wetlands in the postal administration ordered by the public tourist establishment in North Korea; (c) KRW 80,000,000 for the Embane on June 14, 2013; (d) the Seoul Special Metropolitan City Mayor, the head of the Office of Security and the head of the District Education Office of Security of the Public-Private Tourist Complex and the Agency for the Construction of a toilet Construction Project, the Plaintiff paid KRW 50,00,00 for the banner on June 15, 2013; and (e) KRW 2.2.2 million for the banner on July 4, 2013.

(hereinafter referred to as the "persons related to the duties of this case" in the total of the above Gosan General Gyeongsan (hereinafter referred to as the "Seoul Special Metropolitan City").

The Gyeonggi-do Personnel Committee shall be the plaintiff's status.

On the ground that the act described in paragraph (1) (hereinafter “instant disciplinary action”) violates the provisions of Articles 53 (Duty of Integrity) and 55 (Duty of Integrity) of the Local Public Officials Act and falls under Article 69 (Disciplinary Grounds) of the same Act, the Defendant passed a resolution on the disciplinary action for January of the salary reduction against the Plaintiff. Accordingly, on January 7, 2014, the Defendant took a disciplinary action for January of the salary reduction (hereinafter “instant disposition”).

E. On February 2014, the Plaintiff filed an appeal review with the Gyeonggi-do Appeal Committee, and the Gyeonggi-do Appeal Committee made the instant disposition on April 7, 2014.