logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 대전지방법원 공주지원 2018.12.07 2018고합32
공직선거법위반
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On February 23, 2015, the Defendant is a local public official who was appointed as a public official with class VI experience in administration for B viewing and served as the head of the team at the present viewing C Team.

Local public officials as provided in the Local Public Officials Act shall not carry out an election campaign, and public officials shall provide education to residents in the constituency, or whatever the pretext it is a specific political party or candidate (including a person wishing to be a candidate

(hereinafter the same shall apply)

No person shall engage in any activity to publicize his/her achievements.

1. Nevertheless, despite the violation of D-Related Public Official Election Act, the defendant support the F, which is a candidate for a political party B B market at the 7th simultaneous local elections, at the place on April 16, 2018.

After joining a member in the name of “H” and “I” in “D (G)” and on May 10, 2018, the politics is not a speech.

As a result, it is shown.

What is the election of the political people who do not have trust 96% of the implementation of the pledge will be what is.

.F At this time, the 100% goal is to achieve the 100% goal.

In addition to posting the letter "," a total of 19 times from April 23, 2018 to May 15, 2018, 2018, as shown in the attached Table 1 List of Crimes, F was posted on the said bulletin board to allow approximately 446 members to view it.

Accordingly, the defendant, despite being a local public official, conducted an election campaign and promoted F's achievements as a candidate for B market.

2. Although the Defendant, on December 10, 2017, knew of the fact that F transferred F to B market re-elections at the 7th simultaneous local elections, the Defendant, in violation of the J-related Election Act, posted a notice that F was entitled to M in the J account under the name of the Defendant (K) at the fourth L commemorative ceremony, together with a photograph of the award. The notice was re-written in attached Table 2.

arrow