Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 2,500,000.

If a fine is not paid, 50,000 won shall be converted into one day.

Punishment of the crime

[2012 Highly 893] The Defendant was a member of the homeland reserve forces, and on February 22, 2012, the Defendant did not receive the above training in the name of the 3879 commander of the Army, which was conducted on March 15, 2012 at the night tower training site located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, which was conducted on March 12, 2012 at the night tower training site located in Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, which was conducted on March 15, 2012.

[2012 High Court Decision 894] The Defendant was a member of the homeland reserve forces. On February 22, 2012, the Defendant was a member of the homeland reserve forces, and the Defendant was issued a notice of convening a drill in the name of the 3879 commander of the Army, which was issued on March 16, 2012 at the branch of the Defendant’s house of Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Seoul Special Metropolitan City, about 402, and that it would result in the second supplementary training for the first time carried forward at the camphouse located in the camping-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si on March 16, 2012, and did not undergo the training

[2012. The Defendant was a member of the homeland reserve forces. On February 22, 2012, the Defendant received the notice of call-up for the training of homeland reserve forces under the name of the third unit commander of the 3879 unit commander of the Army, which was conducted at the camping tower training site located in the Yoldong-dong, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, Sungnam-si, and from March 13 to March 14, 2012, and did not undergo the above training without justifiable grounds.

Summary of Evidence

[2012 High Court Decision 893]

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation (2012 high-level 894);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. A written accusation (2012 Goun964);

1. Defendant's legal statement;

1. Application of the Acts and subordinate statutes on the written accusation;

1. Relevant provisions of the Acts and the choice of punishment for the crimes, and Articles 15 (9) 1 and 6 (1) of the Establishment of Homeland Reserve Forces Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Articles 38 (1) 2 and 50 of the Criminal Act;

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act for the detention of a workhouse;

1. It is so decided as per Disposition for not less than Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act.