beta
Text
1. The Defendants jointly share KRW 85,000,000 with respect thereto to the Plaintiff and the period from November 9, 2017 to December 7, 2017.
Reasons
1. Basic facts
A. The status of the party is a corporation established for the purpose of making automated machines and gold-type design, etc., and Defendant B Co., Ltd. (hereinafter “Defendant Co., Ltd.”) changed the trade name on January 27, 2016 to “E Co., Ltd.” and completed registration of change on February 3, 2016. Defendant C was a corporation established for the purpose of building facility management service business, etc., Defendant C is the representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd., and Defendant D was a representative director of the Defendant Co., Ltd., and Defendant D was a former inside director of the Defendant Co., Ltd from March 31, 2015 as an employee of the Defendant Co., Ltd. (hereinafter as seen below, it is difficult to know the grounds for registering Defendant D as a director, and thereafter, Defendant D was dismissed on June 16, 2016.
(b).
1) In order to ensure liquidity of management funds on June 27, 2014, the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company: (a) issued a promissory note with a total par value of KRW 400 million, and (b) provided that the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company shall use the promissory note at a discount of KRW 200 million; (c) the Plaintiff and the Defendant Company shall pay the total amount used at a discount of KRW 100 million; and (d) the Plaintiff’s factory located in the Military CityF (hereinafter “instant factory”).
(2) As above, the Plaintiff’s use of the machinery and equipment, etc. as collateral for the repayment obligation of KRW 200 million used by the Plaintiff and the lending and borrowing contract of money (hereinafter “instant loan contract”).
(2) On June 27, 2014, the Defendant Company issued and delivered each of the Promissory Notes worth KRW 400 million in total (hereinafter “each of the Promissory Notes”). The Plaintiff offered funds through the discount of each of the Promissory Notes, and the Plaintiff paid KRW 120 million to the Defendant Company until the maturity date of each of the Promissory Notes.