beta
Text
1. The Defendants and the designated parties confirm that they have the right to passage over the surrounding land in Jeju-si H.
Reasons
Facts of recognition
The following facts can be acknowledged in light of the fact that there is no dispute, the evidence submitted by the plaintiff and the defendant, the result of the on-site verification and the purport of the entire pleadings
In Jeju City I and J (hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff’s land,” the land is indicated only once index, and the land is indicated only). The Defendants and the designated parties (excluding F) are co-owners of H land (hereinafter referred to as “instant land”).
On April 22, 2020, the Designating Party F donated all of its shares to G, which is the assignee and successor.
In full view of the Plaintiff’s statement No. 2-3 of the Plaintiff’s surrounding land traffic right Gap evidence No. 2-3 and the result of this court’s on-site inspection, as seen above, the land registration map, including the instant land, was divided into the Plaintiff’s land in the shape of a road up to the Plaintiff’s land, including the instant land, in a straight line. The current status of the instant land has not yet been developed, and is being used as a dry field, and the instant land was used as a dry field. The Defendants stockpiled a fence (the subject of removal of the instant case) between the instant land and L land, and the Defendants’ direct and efficient facts (the land proposed by the Defendant is not directly connected to the Plaintiff’s land) are recognized.
H In full view of the facts above HI JK L, the Plaintiff has the right to passage over the surrounding land to the Plaintiff, and the Defendants and the designated parties should not interfere with their passage, so the attached drawings regarding the land of this case are to be removed from the line that connects each point, (1), (2), (3), (4), (1).
(A) The Plaintiff’s right to passage over surrounding land should be recognized by 2 meters wide from the Plaintiff’s right to passage over surrounding land, as the Plaintiff did not modify the purport of the claim according to the result of the survey.
that such land should be allowed to pass into or from other land.