beta
Text
A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for one year.
Of the facts charged of this case, the prosecution against assault and intimidation is dismissed.
Reasons
Punishment of the crime
"2017 Highest 2122"
1. From April 16, 2017 to April 05:00 to April 17, 2017, the Defendant damaged the “E” main points operated by Guro-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government Victim D, thereby destroying the entrance door door at the market price of the said main points as drinking by the Defendant.
"2017 Highest 2930"
2. Around April 13, 2017, the Defendant interfered with the Defendant’s business by force for about 20 minutes, such as: (a) the Defendant expressed a large voice as “Cin, the Police Station reported to the police station,” on the ground that at H’s H location in the management of the Victim G (V, South, and fifty-three years of age) located in the Republic of Korea, an employee at the said location “on the site of the repair of the goods”; and (b) the Defendant collected spaws and goods displayed at the said location, and thereby interfered with the Mart business of the damaged person for about twenty minutes by force.
3. The Defendant damaged property: (a) at the date and time specified in the above paragraph (2) above; (b) at the victim I’s I’s market price of 15,120 won; (c) coffee 4 boxes equivalent to the market price of 96,800 won; and (d) 11,400 won at the market price; (b) 3 cans at the market price of 17,100 won at the market price; (c) 17,100 won at the market price; (d) 4 sugar at the market price of 17,800 won at the market price; and (d) 2 cans at the market price of 8,000 won at the price of 8,00 won at the market price; and (d) 16,000 won at the market price of 24,200 won at the market price of 204,200 won at the market price; or (d) 24,200 won at the market price of goods at the market price of 20.
"2017 Highest 4732"
4. On August 9, 2017, the Defendant who interfered with the business refers to the “L” of the Victim K (ML) management in Guro-gu Seoul High Court, Guro-gu, Seoul High Court around August 17:40, 2017, that the Defendant expressed the victim’s desire to pay the Defendant any money borrowed from the Defendant, such as “the victim’s husband does not pay the Defendant any money,” and “the victim’s husband does not have any crys, eyes, and the young children,” and that “the customer who had been located there is no bad age for this year.”