The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The main point of the grounds for appeal is that the sentence (3 million won, confiscation) imposed by the court below on the defendant is too unreasonable.

2. The circumstances are favorable to the defendant, such as the fact that the defendant recognized the crime of this case and expressed an attitude against the defendant, the running period of the game of this case is relatively short of seven days, and the size of the business seems to be less than that of the game of this case, and the fact that the defendant has no record of punishment for the same crime.

However, the crime related to illegal games is likely to cause excessive gambling to the general public and have a great social harm due to the crime that undermines sound labor awareness. The court below seems to have reduced part of the fine imposed in the summary order, taking into account the favorable circumstances of the defendant, and considering the balance in sentencing with the same and similar cases as the defendant's age, sex, environment, background, method of the crime, circumstances after the crime, criminal records, etc., it cannot be deemed that the punishment imposed by the court below is unfair because it is too appropriate and too unreasonable.

Therefore, the defendant's assertion is without merit.

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.