Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 200,000 won.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Punishment of the crime

On January 15, 2018, at around 18:30, the Defendant, on the street in Gwangju Northern-gu C, where the victim D's driver's car was not driven by the front side of the front side of the vehicle in Gwangju Northern-gu, and the Defendant followed the border, which led to a spitation of the face of the victim and the victim among the city expenses, and assaulted the victim by spiting the face.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. Legal statement of the witness D;

1. A written diagnosis of injury;

1. Application of CD-related Acts and subordinate statutes

1. Relevant Article of the Criminal Act and Article 260 (1) of the Criminal Act concerning the crime. Article 260 (Selection of Penalty)

1. Articles 70 and 69 (2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The portion not guilty under Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act, which is the order of provisional payment;

1. On January 15, 2018, the Defendant, at around 18:30 on the street located in Gwangju Northern-gu, Gwangju, the Defendant, who followed the Defendant’s vehicle that was driven by the victim, could not proceed on the front side of the front side of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the vehicle in front of the front side of the vehicle in front of the victim and the part E of the Defendant who was accompanied by the vehicle in front

2. According to the testimony of the victim, E is not an assaulting victim in cooperation with the defendant in a trial between the defendant and the victim, as it is acknowledged that the victim's knife k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k's k'

Therefore, this part of the facts charged should be pronounced not guilty by the latter part of Article 325 of the Criminal Procedure Act because it constitutes a case where there is no proof of a crime. However, inasmuch as it is found that the facts charged with a single crime are guilty, the judgment of innocence shall not be