Text
1. The plaintiff's appeal is dismissed.
2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Purport of claim and appeal
The first instance court.
Reasons
1. The reasoning for the court's explanation concerning this case is as follows: "3 of the first instance court's 4th 3th 3th '2'; "5th 5th 4th 5th 5th 5th 4th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 5th 11st 11st 7th 7th 11st 8th 8th 4th 8th 8th 4th 8th 8th 4th 8th 1st 2nd 2nd 1st 2nd 2nd 1st 1st 200th 1st 2nd 5th 2nd
2. On October 31, 2015, 2015, the 5th board of directors (hereinafter “the 5th board of directors”) added under the 4th parallel 2) was also deemed to be the 5th board of directors.
) : M (Acting for the Chief Director), J, L, K, the plaintiff, and I attend the 5th meeting of the board of directors (the 5th meeting of the board of directors of the board of directors, and the 16th meeting of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors. If the audit of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors is completed, the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the Republic of Korea is deemed to refer to November 16, 2015, which was the time limit for reporting the instant corrective measures of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the board of directors of the Republic of Korea.)
Furthermore, through the Defendant’s second guidance, the instant corrective order should have been implemented until December 10, 2015. As such, the Plaintiff and I, even though they were above.