A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than two years and six months.

Of the facts charged in the instant case, the damage to property and the invasion of the structure on June 13, 2012.

Punishment of the crime

"2014 Highest 866"

1. On October 29, 2012, the Defendant submitted a written complaint to the public prosecutor’s office of the Daegu District Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-dong-si, and stated the complaint in the prosecutor’s office

The purport of the accusation was that the Defendant was investigated by the racing police station on the charge of “E, who is an employee belonging to D Co., Ltd., and thereby interfered with the business of preventing him from doing so,” under the suspicion that “E, who was an employee belonging to D Co., Ltd., from October 28, 2012, prevented him from carrying out the business.” Although E stated in the Fabox, that “I would not want to be punished against the Defendant,” the above C falsely stated in the written statement that “I want to punish the Defendant” and prepared a false official document. However, the above E wishes to punish the Defendant.”

The above C and other policemen who conducted the investigation together with the above C and G prepared the true statement according to the above statement. Accordingly, the Defendant was not subject to criminal punishment. On January 30, 2013, the Defendant submitted a complaint at the Daegu Police Office’s Public Prosecutor’s Office located in Dong-dong, Dong-dong, and stated the facts of the complaint at the investigation station of the racing and police station located in the same Dong-dong on February 27, 2013 and the I Office. The purport of the accusation is that “the Defendant interfered with the business of JK on October 30, 2012.” The investigation of the Police Station before the Defendant was investigated on the suspicion of “the Defendant interfered with the business of JK’s representative on October 30, 2012,” and “The Defendant demanded money from the Defendant to be inserted in the detention room immediately if 50% of the cost of appointing an attorney-at-law was our country at once.”

However, the racing police station that investigated the defendant did not make the above remarks to the defendant.

Accordingly, the Defendant’s above Hro.