logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 제주지방법원 2018.02.07 2017고단2444
교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The defendant is a dump truck truck truck driver.

On March 16, 2017, the Defendant driven the above cargo vehicle at around 14:30, while proceeding one lane near D in Jeju, from the direction towards the west of the bill, the letter near D in front of D at Jeju.

Since the place is 60km in the front and the speed of the restriction is 60km, there was a duty of care to prevent accidents in advance by complying with the speed limit and operating the steering system and operating the steering system accurately and safely.

Nevertheless, the Defendant neglected this and driven a speed exceeding 37 km per hour by negligence of driving a speed exceeding 97 km per hour, from the right side of the Defendant’s running direction to the left side of the Defendant’s running direction, and discovered and immediately operated a driver’s car to the left side of the victim E (V) who was entering the above shooting distance, but did not avoid the situation, and received the left side of the said car as the front part of the said cargo vehicle.

Ultimately, the Defendant suffered injury to the victim, such as T1 and T12’s closed frame, which requires approximately eight weeks of treatment due to such occupational negligence.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. E statements;

1. Report on the occurrence of a traffic accident;

1. A general medical certificate (E);

1. A map at the scene of an accident;

1. Application of related Acts and subordinate statutes to photographs;

1. Article 3 (1) and the proviso to Article 3 (2) of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents, Article 268 of the Criminal Act concerning criminal facts;

1. Selection of a selective fine for punishment (including the reflection of the punishment, the fact that there is no past record of the same kind of crime, and the fact that there is an unanimous agreement with the victim);

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. Article 334 (1) of the Criminal Procedure Act concerning the order of provisional payment;

arrow