The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

1. The decision of the court below (one year of imprisonment) is too unreasonable in its summary of the grounds for appeal.

2. The following circumstances are favorable: (a) the Defendant led to the confession and reflect of all the instant crimes; and (b) the victims and the Defendant agreed smoothly; (c) the instant crime was committed by force in the vicinity of the Incheon International Airport Passenger Terminal’s Office by force; (d) the Defendant interfered with the victim’s service or inflicted injury on the victim F; (e) the frequency and details of the instant crime were very poor; (e) the victims did not have much number of times of the instant crime or victims; (e) the Defendant was subject to criminal punishment for a total time of violent crimes; and (e) the Defendant was also subject to criminal punishment for the same kind of crime; and (e) the same type of crime was two times of the crime of interference with business on September 8, 2011. In particular, the Defendant was sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the instant crime for three years after being sentenced to the suspension of the execution of the instant crime for a period of one year and two months under the same law, and (e) the Defendant’s age, character environment, and circumstances before and arguments.

3. If so, the defendant's appeal is without merit, and it is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act. It is so decided as per Disposition.