logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울북부지방법원 2013.09.06 2013고정486
정보통신망이용촉진및정보보호등에관한법률위반등
Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of 2.5 million won.

If the defendant fails to pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be one day.

Reasons

. In India’s prior to “G real estate” in F, the victims were openly insultingd by saying, “The victims were changed to her name, she was born, she was raising to the effect that the her name was changed to the morale.”

3. Interference with business;

A. On November 3, 2012, the Defendant: (a) around 13:30 on November 3, 2012, the “E Real Estate” operated by the Victim C; (b) deemed that the victim is acting as real estate intermediary for a real-time customer; and (c) said, “this woman is a woman who is acting as a broker for a real-time customer, and if so, is a woman who is acting as a broker for a certain period, it would be so much to pay for a contract; and (d) said, it interfere

B. On November 5, 2012, around 15:00 on November 15, 2012, the Defendant reported that the victim C and four customers under a real estate agreement were paid any balance under the real estate agreement with the victim C, and thereby interfered with the victim’s real estate brokerage business by force by force, such as: (a) who is working in the office of South Korea, and (b) who is in the office of South Korea; (c)**.

Summary of Evidence

1. Partial statement of the defendant;

1. C’s legal statement;

1. A protocol of partial police interrogation of the accused;

1. Statement to C by the police;

1. Complaint;

1. Recording notes;

1. Letters, contents and photographs of a course (not more than 14 pages of investigation records);

1. Application of the USB Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Relevant provisions of Article 74 (1) 3 and Article 44-7 (1) 3 of the Act on Promotion of Information and Communications Network Utilization and Information Protection, Etc. (the point of repeated transmission of language and text causing fear or miscompetence), Article 311 of the Criminal Act, Articles 314 (1) and 313 of the Criminal Act concerning facts constituting an offense, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act, and Article 314 (1) of the Criminal Act;

1. Of concurrent crimes, the former part of Article 37, Article 38(1)2 and Article 50 of the Criminal Act.

arrow