1. The defendant shall make the plaintiffs 3858.87 square meters in the retail market of the steel structure, the steel structure, the steel structure, the roof of the general steel structure on the ground B of Yeongdeungpo-gu, Young-gu.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Korea Savings Bank Co., Ltd. was declared bankrupt on April 30, 2013 by the Seoul Central District Court 2013Hahap47, and the Yong-Nam Savings Bank Co., Ltd. was declared bankrupt on September 26, 2013 by the Busan District Court 2013Hahap16, each of which was appointed by the Korea Deposit Insurance Corporation as a trustee in bankruptcy of the said Savings Bank on the same day.

(hereinafter referred to as “Plaintiff Korea Savings Bank” and “Plaintiff Yong-Nam Savings Bank,” regardless of whether it was before or after the bankruptcy, and in total, “Plaintiffs”. (b)

On March 17, 2014, the Plaintiffs entered into a lease agreement with the Defendant on the terms of KRW 500,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0

C. On April 25, 2014, the Defendant: (a) registered the instant building as “trade name: category of business: service business; category of business: laundry business;” and (b) operated laundry business in the instant building from around that time to the date of closing argument.

On November 11, 2014, the Plaintiffs notified the Defendant of the intent to refuse the renewal of the instant lease by content-certified mail.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, entry of Gap evidence 1 to 3, purport of the whole pleadings

2. As seen earlier, the Defendant’s judgment on the cause of the claim has completed business registration in the building of this case and carried on laundry business. Considering the rent and deposit amount of the building of this case, the building of this case constitutes a commercial building subject to the Commercial Building Lease Protection Act.

Therefore, even if the plaintiffs and the defendant set the term of the lease agreement of this case for six months, the term of the lease shall be one year.