Defendant

All appeals filed by the Defendants B and the Prosecutor are dismissed.

1. Summary of grounds for appeal;

A. Of the proceeds indicated in the instant X-cell file, the rents, personnel expenses, and the portion paid to customers as a service should be deducted.

B. A prosecutor 1) misunderstanding of legal principles (not guilty part, Defendant A’s criminal escape), Defendant A, upon Defendant B’s request, made a false statement in detail at an investigative agency as if he actually engaged in the game of this case as to the game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s of this case’s game of this case’s game of this case’s

2. Determination

A. As to Defendant B’s assertion of the misapprehension of the legal doctrine, whether the subject matter of collection is subject to collection, or the recognition of the amount of collection is unnecessary. However, even if the cost spent by an offender to obtain criminal proceeds was spent from criminal proceeds, it is not merely a method of consuming criminal proceeds, and thus, should not be deducted from criminal proceeds to be collected. 2) The amount of benefits paid to employees asserted by the Defendant and the expenses paid as rents, etc. to operate the game of this case is merely a method of consuming criminal proceeds acquired from this case’s money exchange business, and it is not a deduction from criminal proceeds to be collected.

Defendant

B’s above assertion is without merit.

B. The prosecutor's defendant A