Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 5,000,000.

If the defendant does not pay the above fine, 50,000 won shall be paid.

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant, under the direction of the telephone financial fraud organization (one name “Scam”) (a means of deceiving the victims to transfer money by misrepresenting the employees of a financial institution, etc.), conspired with the Defendant to acquire money by fraud in the name of the telephone financial fraud operator in the name of the passbook and to deliver the money to the victims by fraud in the name of the passbook (one name “Scaming”), and with the order of “Scaming” to withdraw the money deposited in the passbook under the direction of the “Scam”, “Korean General Liability”, “China General Liability”, “China General Liability” and “Scaming”, etc. to transfer the withdrawn money from the passbook to China, and each role in the form of an organization in the form of a cash system).

On October 14, 2013, telephone financial fraud crime in the name of the victim was committed by phone calls from the victim C via the call center to the effect that “C,” while misrepresenting himself/herself as an employee, he/she deceivings the victim for early repayment of loans that he/she received from the “Saeacom” to lend money at low interest,” and then deceivings the victim, and accordingly, he/she has the victim wired KRW 3,376,300 to the Agricultural Cooperative Account in the name of D around 15:14 of the same day.

On the same day, the Defendant received an instruction from a telephone financial fraud offender in his name, and then withdrawn the cash amount of KRW 3.370,000 from the above D’s account using a cash card held at one bank in Mapo-gu Seoul, Mapo-gu, Seoul, and then returned the said money to the national bank account in the name of the Defendant who transferred the means of access, such as a security card, to the telephone financial fraud offender.

Accordingly, the defendant, in collusion with the telephone financial fraud crime in the name of the defendant, acquired 3,376,300 won through the scam method.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Application of C’s loan fraud damage statement to Acts and subordinate statutes;

1. Criminal facts;