beta
Text
1. The plaintiff's claim is dismissed.
2. The costs of lawsuit shall be borne by the Plaintiff.
Reasons
1. The plaintiff's assertion that the defendant committed an unlawful act, including the plaintiff's spouse C and C, and thereby caused mental suffering to the plaintiff.
Therefore, the defendant is obligated to pay to the plaintiff 30,000,100 won as consolation money and damages for delay.
2. According to the overall purport of each of the statements and arguments stated in Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 6 (including each number), the facts that the plaintiff and Eul are legally married couple who completed the marriage report, and the fact that there are several currencies between Gap and the defendant from January 2018 to May 2018 are recognized.
However, the following circumstances, which are acknowledged by the purport of each of the above evidence and arguments, are: ① most of the call time between the Plaintiff and the Defendant is limited to 1-2 minutes or less (the call time around June 3, 2018 is about 11-2 seconds or 32 seconds, which is suspected of interfering with the business of the Plaintiff and the Defendant, after the Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Plaintiff under suspicion of interference with the business of the Defendant in the course of finding and pursuing a restaurant for the operation of the Defendant; the Defendant made a request to the Defendant for withdrawal of the above complaint; and the remainder of the call content also made a request by C to the Defendant for withdrawal of the above complaint; and there is no material to know that C made a promise to a restaurant or made a request for an unilateral questioning; ② A made a mistake to the Plaintiff several times.
In full view of the fact that text messages are sent to the purport that they are either or not presented, but the purport of recognizing the act of misconduct with the Defendant is not to include the above text messages, and that C may send such text messages to recover the relationship with the Plaintiff, and that the content of text messages sent by the Defendant to C is merely that “the Plaintiff was not the Plaintiff,” each of the above evidence submitted by the Plaintiff alone.