logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울동부지방법원 2018.05.30 2017고단1054
특수상해
Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for not less than eight months.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

On July 12, 2016, around 10:05, the Defendant: (a) Dad-59 of Songpa-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government DD DD building 3rd floor D-2; (b) Dad-59, and (c) Dod-gu dialogues with the company management issues, the Defendant did not dispute on the ground that she did not fit with her opinion; (c) Dod-Wed-to-face, which is a dangerous object in opening the door of the company's own office, had the victim threaten her face and body at approximately 10 times with her own food, and caused the victim to inflict injury, such as Dam typhy, inside and inside the arms of the company, spathy, spathy, and cerebral typhy, etc., which requires four weeks of treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. Statement E;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to a report on investigation (Submission of a medical certificate of injury);

1. Penalty provisions: Criminal Act 258-21, and 257 (1);

1. Reduction of a small amount: The reason for sentencing under Article 53 of the Criminal Act is serious in full view of the following: (a) the defendant, without participating in a conflict of opinion with the victim who is in a business partnership or cooperation relationship, threatened the victim who is not the other party to die with a deadly weapon (the victim's statement) and without any reason to be taken into account in large and different circumstances; (b) there are many criminal records including a large number of criminal records; (c) a large number of criminal records including a variety of criminal records, and (d) an arrest and investigation was conducted by a designated number of times after escape during the investigation process, which led to the failure of the criminal elements and the offender's elements.

15,00,000 won was deposited, but it is not sufficient to recognize it as a restrictive amount for adequate recovery of damage and illegal act. Therefore, the lower limit of the statutory penalty is reflected only in reducing the amount of punishment, and the penalty is imposed.

arrow