1. The plaintiffs' appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal are assessed against the Plaintiffs.

The purport of the claim and appeal is the purport of the appeal.

1. The reasoning of the court’s explanation concerning this case is as follows, except in the following cases, it is stated in the reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance. Thus, the court’s explanation of this case is citing it as it is in accordance with the main sentence of Article 420 of the Civil Procedure Act.

In full view of the following circumstances acknowledged by the fact finding facts as above and the evidence Nos. 3, 5, 8, 11 through 14 (including paper numbers), the fact finding as to the strike market of this court, i.e., the address of R, the fact finding as to the land investigation injury, i.e., the address of R, the fact finding as to the land investigation injury, i.e., Qu, while the permanent domicile of the network A, the co-ordination of Plaintiff B, the co-ordination of the Plaintiff B, is "Yae-gun", ii) was combined into the administrative area of 1914, and was changed into AP pages in 1934, and the name of AM was changed into the administrative area of 1934 at the time of the preparation of the land investigation register. As such, there is no possibility that R, the circumstance of the Plaintiff’s co-ordination’s address cannot be excluded from the possibility of being other than the “Yari-gun,” and there is no evidence to acknowledge it as the same person as the land investigation person.

2. In conclusion, the plaintiffs' claim shall be dismissed as it is without merit, and the judgment of the court of first instance shall be justified and the plaintiffs' appeal shall be dismissed as it is so decided as per Disposition.