logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 전주지방법원 2017.04.27 2017노334
도로교통법위반(음주운전)등
Text

The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

Reasons

1. The decision of the court below on the summary of the reasons for appeal (eight months of imprisonment) is too unreasonable.

2. It is recognized that the judgment recognizes the defendant's mistake and reflects it, as well as those supporting families, including those with poor health.

However, at the time of the instant crime, the Defendant’s blood alcohol concentration is considerably high to 0.201% at the time of the instant crime, and the Defendant was arrested as the current offender while leaving a vehicle to avoid the crackdown on drinking, and there was no record of having been punished several times after the instant crime, and in particular, on June 15, 2016, the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the suspension period of execution for which two years have not passed since he was sentenced to a suspension of execution for 6 months due to a violation of the Road Traffic Act (driving) in the former District Court’s military support on the grounds that the Defendant was sentenced to a suspension of execution for 6 months and one month has not passed since it was sentenced to a suspension of execution, and the Defendant committed the instant crime again during the suspension period of execution for which 1 month has not passed yet, taking full account of the circumstances, motive, means, and consequence leading up to the instant crime, and the situation before and after the instant crime, it is not recognized that the lower court’

3. In conclusion, the defendant's appeal is dismissed in accordance with Article 364 (4) of the Criminal Procedure Act on the grounds that the defendant's appeal is without merit. It is so decided as per Disposition.

arrow