(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.01.23 2017고단4080

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 울산지방법원 2018.01.23 2017고단4080

교통사고처리특례법위반(치상)

Text

Defendant shall be punished by a fine of KRW 4,000,000.

When the defendant does not pay the above fine, 100,000 won.

Reasons

Criminal facts

The Defendant is a person who is engaged in driving a QM5 car.

On October 25, 2017, the Defendant driven the above car at around 17:40 on the 17:40, and proceeded from the front side of the E-lane D at Yangsan City, at a speed of about 60km per hour from the direction of the Yangsan Police Station.

Since there is a signal apparatus at a three-distance intersection, a person engaged in driving duty has a duty of care to safely drive according to the signals of signal apparatus.

Nevertheless, the Defendant did not neglect the above duty of care and proceeded with the red stop signals as they were, at the time, to turn to the left from the 2-day factory of the friendly chemical industry to the Public Security Center in accordance with the new subparagraph, at the time, the victim F. (38 tax) of the Gol-do Driving Gol-do driving car was driven by the front part of the above QM5 car.

As a result, the defendant suffered from occupational negligence the 5th left-hand cage cage, which requires approximately seven weeks of medical treatment.

Summary of Evidence

1. Statement by the defendant in court;

1. A report on the occurrence of a traffic accident, a survey report on actual condition, and a photograph of the accident scene;

1. A medical certificate;

1. Application of Acts and subordinate statutes to report on investigation (a victim's telephone statement concerning the circumstances of accident);

1. Article 3(1) and the proviso to Article 3(2)1 of the Act on Special Cases concerning the Settlement of Traffic Accidents According to the relevant criminal facts, Article 268 of the Criminal Act, and the selection of fines;

1. Article 70(1) and Article 69(2) of the Criminal Act to attract a workhouse;

1. The sentencing of Article 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act (amended by Act No. 334(1) of the Criminal Procedure Act) is heavy by negligence due to the violation of the signal of rapid suspension, and the degree of injury to the victim is not less than that of the victim. However, the defendant agreed with the victim individually, and the defendant has only one fine due to the violation of the Motor Vehicle Management Act in 2000, taking into account the fact that only one fine was imposed on the defendant due to the violation of the

참조조문

유사 판례

-수원지방법원 안양지원 2018.09.04 2018고단727

-서울북부지방법원 2017.07.13 2017고단1902

-부산지방법원 서부지원 2018.09.05 2018고정583

-대전지방법원 2017.12.14 2017고단4100

-창원지방법원 2018.07.18 2018고정354