1. The Plaintiff, the Defendant A, and the Defendant B, each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, and the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

1. Facts of recognition;

A. The Plaintiff (the Korea National Housing Corporation prior to the change: the owner of each real estate listed in the separate sheet (hereinafter “each of the instant real estate”).

B. From the Plaintiff, Defendant A leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 1, Defendant B leased the real estate listed in the separate sheet No. 2.

C. When the Defendants leased each of the instant real estate from the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff may terminate the lease agreement immediately, and the lessee agreed to restore the said real estate to its original state and return it to the Plaintiff upon the termination of the lease agreement.

The Defendants had a long-term grace period of not less than three months, and the Plaintiff notified the Defendants of the termination of the lease agreement on each of the instant real estate on the grounds of the prolonged grace period. Moreover, the Defendants and the Defendants expressed their intent to terminate the lease agreement with the Defendants on the basis of the delivery of the duplicate of the instant complaint.

[Ground of recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap 1 and 3 evidence (including each number), the purport of the whole pleadings

2. According to the above facts of recognition, the defendants are obligated to deliver each of the real estate possessed by them to the plaintiff who exercises the right to claim the removal of disturbance based on ownership as the owner of each real estate. Thus, the defendants are obligated to deliver each of the real estate in attached Form 1, and the defendant Eul is obligated to deliver each of the real estate in

Therefore, the plaintiff's claim against the defendants is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.