logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 서울서부지방법원 2019.01.24 2016가합34595
소유권이전등기
Text

1. The Defendant: (a) KRW 373,673,482, respectively, to Plaintiff A, KRW 560,510,224, and KRW 373,673,482; and (b) from May 17, 2018 to May 2019.

Reasons

1. Basic facts

A. The relationship between the parties (1) Plaintiff A is the legal status of the deceased E (hereinafter “the deceased”). Plaintiff B and C are the deceased’s successors. The Plaintiffs are the deceased’s successors.

(2) From around 1996, the Deceased was living separately with the Defendant, who was the employee of this village, from around 199, and from around 2002, the Deceased was living together with F, who was his father.

B. Acquisition of real estate in the name of the defendant (1) purchased the deceased's funds from the defendant's funds by purchasing the G 517 square meters in the previous G at the time of the Government, which was part of the deceased's funds, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant on March 8, 1997, and completed the registration of ownership transfer in the name of the defendant on January 4, 199 as to the commercial building of the first and third floors on the pertinent land

(2) The G Real Estate (hereinafter referred to as “H”)’s trade name from August 2, 2004 to December 5, 2009, the name “H” from July 1, 2010 to December 14, 2010, and the name “I” from September 27, 2010 to August 5, 2015. The actual operation of the G Real Estate was the deceased and the Defendant, and the F was the instructor at the pertinent private teaching institute.

C. The Deceased and the Defendant prepared a partnership contract with the content as shown in the attached Form 1 on September 1, 2008.

(2) Article 9 of the Agreement on the Trade of this case provides that “The other party’s legal heir shall be bound to link and continue the agreement, and the other party’s legal heir shall be bound to agree or have so agreed upon.”

(1) The deceased died on January 23, 2016, and thereafter the plaintiffs and the defendant continue to maintain a partnership agreement and their property in accordance with the instant contract for the partnership.

arrow