1. The defendant is against the plaintiffs:

A. Of each real estate listed in separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, 1/2 shares shall be as to July 7, 2016.

1. Basic facts

A. On October 29, 2013, the Defendant completed the registration of ownership transfer based on sale on October 7, 2013, with respect to each real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 through (3).

In the location of indication of real estate: building D with a lot of 337 square meters in Changwon-si: 150 million won in the purchase price of reinforced concrete and sloping roof 890.37 square meters in the purchase price of KRW 1.325 million in the purchase price of KRW 890.37 square meters in the sloping shelf: The balance paid at the time of a contract and the intermediate payment in the receipt: 250 million in the contract: 925 million in the payment on October 31, 2016: 925 million in the amount; 450 million won in the loan and the lease deposit amount of KRW 80 million in the payment on November 30, 2016 shall be succeeded.

B. On July 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs drafted a sales contract (hereinafter “instant sales contract”) with the Defendant with the following terms and conditions (hereinafter “instant sales contract”).

[Reasons for Recognition] Unsatisfy, each entry in Gap evidence 1 and 4 (including provisional number), and the purport of the whole pleadings

2. As to the claim for ownership transfer registration

A. Although the Plaintiffs alleged that they purchased real estate listed in the attached list No. 3 from the Defendant on July 7, 2016, the Plaintiffs asserted that they purchased the real estate listed in the attached list No. 3 from the Defendant on July 7, 2016, the aforementioned assertion by the Plaintiffs is insufficient to recognize the evidence No. 4-2, No. 5, and the witness E’s testimony.

B. According to the above facts as to each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2, the Plaintiffs purchased each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 from the Defendant on July 7, 2016 (hereinafter “instant sales contract”), and the Defendant is obligated to implement the registration procedure for transfer of ownership for each of the real estate listed in the separate sheet Nos. 1 and 2 on July 7, 2016.

⑵ 항변에 대하여 ㈎ 피고는, 이 사건 매매계약에서 정한 매매대금은 13억 2,500만 원이 아니라, 14억 원이므로, 원고들로부터 차액에 해당하는 7,500만 원을 더 지급받기...