beta
Text
The prosecutor's appeal is dismissed.
Reasons
1. The reasoning of the appeal is that the sentence of the lower court (Defendant A: 1 year of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence, 3 million won of fine, 6 months of imprisonment, 2 years of suspended sentence) is too unfluent and unfair.
2. Determination
A. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including Defendant A’s age, sexual conduct, motive, frequency of crime, method of crime, method of crime, circumstances after crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too unreasonable, and thus, cannot be deemed unfair, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the crime; (b) the Defendant did not have any record of punishment exceeding fines; (c) was detained for more than three months; (d) all illegal games were seized; and (e) the fact that all illegal games were seized; (e) the purpose of the distribution was to keep illegal games not classified as class; and (e) the nature of the crime was not weak, such as aiding and abetting the operation of the illegal games site; and (e) attempted to conceal the crime; and (e) all of the sentencing conditions, such as the Defendant’s age, sexual behavior, motive, frequency of crime;
B. In full view of all the sentencing conditions, including Defendant B’s age, sex behavior, motive for and frequency of the crime, method of the crime, circumstance after the crime, etc., the lower court’s punishment is too uneasable and unreasonable, in light of the following circumstances: (a) the Defendant led to the confession of the crime; (b) the Defendant provided a place for the storage of illegal game water; (c) the aid and abetting the provision of a place for the storage of illegal game water; and (d) provided a place for the concealment of illegal game water; and (d) provided a place for the concealment of the illegal game water; and (e) provided it was difficult to investigate the crime.
(c)
Defendant
C The confessions and reflects of the Defendant, the number of illegal games distributed by the Defendant, the benefits acquired by the instant crime are not significant, and the instant crime was detained for a period of two months, and the opportunity to reflect was given.