1. The defendant, among the real estate listed in the separate sheet, indicated in the attached sheet to the plaintiff 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21.

Comprehensively taking account of the overall purport of arguments in the statements and videos of Gap evidence 1-1, evidence 2-1, evidence 2-1, evidence 3-2, and evidence 3, the facts that the defendant owned a building and concrete structure on the land owned by the plaintiff and interfered with the plaintiff's ownership on the land owned by the plaintiff, among the land listed in the attached list owned by the plaintiff as shown in the attached Table No. 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, and 12.

Therefore, in this case where the defendant did not have any assertion on the legitimate title to possess the above land, the defendant is obligated to remove the building and deliver the above part of the land (b) to the plaintiff, which is possessed through the removal of the building and the transfer of 188 square meters. Therefore, the plaintiff's claim of this case is justified and it is so decided as per Disposition.