1. On December 5, 2017, the instant lawsuit was concluded upon the withdrawal of the Defendant’s appeal.

2. After filing an application for designation of the date.

The progress of the lawsuit in this case and the withdrawal of appeal are obvious or obvious to record the following facts in this court:

In the first instance court, the Plaintiff filed a claim against the Defendant as stated in the purport of the claim against the Defendant for a death penalty, price, etc. based on the agricultural product transaction contract with the Defendant, and was rendered a favorable judgment on June 15, 2017.

On June 23, 2017, the defendant filed an appeal.

Accordingly, both pleadings were held on the first and second date for pleading of this Court, which is the appellate court, and the pleadings were concluded on the second date for pleading ( November 22, 2017), and the date for sentencing was designated on December 20, 2017.

On December 5, 2017, the Defendant’s legal representative expressed his/her intention to withdraw an appeal in relation to the instant lawsuit, which was initiated by an electronic litigation, by submitting to this court a written withdrawal of appeal (including both the number and name of the case, the parties, the court and the full bench) in electronic form.

(1) The Defendant’s attorney submitted an application for withdrawal of appeal to the effect that “the withdrawal of appeal has been submitted due to an error, and thus the withdrawal of appeal has been withdrawn” on December 5, 2017, and submitted an application for designation as the date of pleading around 19:28 of the same day.

Judgment

The gist of the Defendant’s legal representative’s assertion is that the Defendant’s legal representative’s withdrawal of the appeal on “Seoul Western District Court 2016Kahap31275 and other (money) cases (Plaintiff: one other, one other, and the Defendant: H)” in the course of preparing and submitting a written withdrawal of appeal on “Seoul Western District Court 2016Gahap31275 and other (money) cases (the Plaintiff: one, the Plaintiff, the Plaintiff, and the Defendant: the Defendant), which are different officials in charge of the Defendant’s legal representative, is an obvious room that

The intention of withdrawal of an appeal of this case, which had been satisfyed in this court's oral argument, is.