(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고합692

beta

본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.

Text

Reasons

텍스트 조절

글꼴

크기(pt)

굵기

줄 간격

자간(%)

(영문) 서울중앙지방법원 2015.11.27 2015고합692

아동ㆍ청소년의성보호에관한법률위반(강간)

Text

A defendant shall be punished by imprisonment for four years.

The defendant shall be ordered to complete 40 hours of sexual assault treatment programs.

Reasons

Punishment of the crime

The Defendant worked as a “F” store in Dongjak-gu Seoul Metropolitan Government, a “F” store, and a “victim G (V, 17 years old)”.

On January 6, 2015, at around 13:00, the Defendant got out of the victim who was instructed by the Defendant to work at the above store to work more than normal, and forced him to go out, and forced him to go out, and then, the Defendant went out of the victim, and found the victim and her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her her sheed

The defendant forcedly exceeded the clothes of the victim and resisting the victim, and issued a sound called "mar" to the victim, and raised the victim as soon as possible after the victim satising him/her into the chest and satisf.

The Defendant “I do not do so. I do not do so. I want to see the victim’s body in which the Defendant is pushed the Defendant, and added the Defendant’s sexual organ into the part of the victim’s sound, and when the victim intending to embling the Defendant’s sexual organ by hand, and resists the victim’s finger, thereby gathering the victim’s finger by other hand, and bruing the victim’s chest with the victim’s chest by other hand.

Accordingly, the defendant attempted to rape a juvenile victim by assault and threat.

Summary of Evidence

1. Each legal statement of witness G, J and K;

1. Each police statement to G and J;

1. A complaint;

1. Each video CD;

1. Details of the report of the 112 Incident, investigation report (on-site investigation and ctv investigation), investigation report (CtV investigation), investigation report (CtV investigation), inquiry report (Ct CCTV contents analysis), inquiry request for appraisal (2015-H-1442), inquiry request for appraisal (2015-M-9018);

1. Each CCTV CD may claim that the Defendant, at the previous session, she entered a her to have her fluence in order to hear and admonish her fluencing a fluencing fe in his/her flusium, and he/she was locked after having her talked, and that she did not have attempted to assault, assault, or rape.

However, this Court has duly adopted and examined evidence.

유사 판례

-의정부지방법원 2013.07.12 2013고합142

-서울중앙지방법원 2021.04.22 2020고합1014

-수원지방법원 성남지원 2014.01.16 2013고합203

-광주지방법원 목포지원 2017.02.09 2016고합137

-대구지방법원 의성지원 2019.01.22 2018고합15