logobeta
본 영문본은 리걸엔진의 AI 번역 엔진으로 번역되었습니다. 수정이 필요한 부분이 있는 경우 피드백 부탁드립니다.
텍스트 조절
arrow
arrow
(영문) 광주고등법원 2020.07.16 2019나23335
공사대금
Text

1. The defendant's appeal is dismissed.

2. The costs of appeal shall be borne by the Defendant.

Purport of claim and appeal

[Claim]

Reasons

1. The reasoning of the judgment of the court of first instance cited by the court of first instance is the same as that of the judgment of the court of first instance, except for the parts which are dismissed or added as set forth in the following paragraph (2). Thus, it is acceptable in accordance with the main sentence of

(However, the part on the joint Plaintiff B and H Co., Ltd., which became separate and final, is excluded). 2. Of the judgment of the first instance, the part on the 3rd 11th EC business is deemed to be “ES business”.

4. The construction work in this case was completed on September 13, 2017, and was approved for use by the head of the Chungcheong Gun around October 16 of the same year.

4 14 pages 14(based on recognition) add “A Evidence No. 14, B No. 17(based on recognition).”

7 4 pages "A No. 17" shall be added to

7. Paragraph 11 to 14 are also considered as follows: “B In the case of arbitration between a testing institute and the Defendant (NAgency ArbitrationO, P(Counterclaim)) related to the price for the instant construction work, it is deemed that there is no significant dispute as to the price for the additional construction work in accordance with the instant machinery and equipment work.”

8 The 8th 19th 19th 19th 9th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 9th 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 1st 20

9 The defendant's 6th page "the defendant" shall be raised to "the plaintiff".

11. The term "construction completion" of the 11th six parallels shall be read as "Completion", the term "Completion Date" of the 8 line as "Completion Date", and the 16 line " September 30, 2018" as "Completion Date", respectively, and the 16 line " September 30, 2017."

12 The term " May 22, 2017" of the 21st 21st parallel shall be read as " May 26, 2017".

3. In conclusion, the judgment of the first instance is legitimate, and the defendant's appeal is dismissed.

arrow