1. The Defendant: (a) 5% per annum from July 24, 2015 to November 23, 2016 with respect to each of the Plaintiffs’ KRW 87,400,012 and each of the said money.

1. Occurrence of liability for damages;

A. The facts of recognition 1) C, around 20:00 on July 24, 2015, driven an Otoba and driven an Obba and turned out from the right edge of the ebbag to the ebbag in the direction of the ebag. D, while driving a ebag and driving into the right edge of the ebag in the direction of the ebag. D, while driving a ebag in the direction of about 88 km along a speed of C and going into the opposite direction, found that the above ebagba flows out to the port, she pushed the central line to the right edge, leading to death (hereinafter referred to as “the instant accident”).

2) 2) The speed of the instant accident site is 60 km, a separate salary was installed on the center line, street lamps were installed, and at that time, the instant accident site was cut off.

3) The heir of C is the plaintiffs who are parents. 4) The defendant is a mutual aid business entity that has entered into a mutual aid agreement with respect to the above taxi.

[Reasons for Recognition] Facts without dispute, Gap evidence Nos. 1 through 5, 8, 9, Eul evidence No. 1 and the purport of the whole pleadings

B. According to the fact that the accident of this case occurred at the time of the accident, since the surface was milched, so as to reduce the maximum speed of 48 km by 60 km, D proceeded at a speed of about 88 km per hour over the speed of 40 km, which is the highest speed of 60 km. D is liable to compensate the Plaintiff for damages caused by the accident of this case pursuant to Article 724 of the Commercial Act.

(c) limitation of liability, provided that D is beyond the opposite lane while driving the Oralb, thereby making C go beyond the opposite lane.